The Long View
Wednesday, November 23, 2011
SharePoint Search in a Cloud Deployment
Wednesday, October 26, 2011
Building Virtual Machines for SharePoint
Wednesday, September 28, 2011
Virtualization Exam 70-659 Training
- Module 1 – Installing and Configuring Host and Parent Settings
- Module 2 – Configuring Child Settings
- Module 3 – Managing and Monitoring Virtual Environments
- Module 4 – Ensuring High Availability and Recoverability
- Module 5 – Performing Migration
- Module 6 – Configuring Remote Desktop (RD) Role Services Infrastructure
Friday, August 5, 2011
Thoughts on Search Security
Writing under the nom de plume of Mathais Thurman, in his “Security Manager’s Journal,” Marthais opined on “The perils of enterprise search”. Mathais’s take away comment is “First and foremost, you have to make sure you don’t compromise the rule of least privilege.”
To those of you not that might not know, the rule or principle of least privilege is:
“The principle of least privilege (POLP) is the practice of limiting access to the minimal level that will allow normal functioning. Applied to employees, the principle of least privilege translates to giving people the lowest level of user rights that they can have and still do their jobs. The principle is also applied to things other than people, including programs and processes.” From http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/definition/principle-of-least-privilege-POLP.
So how are POLP and enterprise search intertwined? One of the key goals of an enterprise search deployment is to index content from various enterprise repositories such as SharePoint sites, web sites, Exchange servers, file shares, and many others. If you do not take into account the security access rights of the various repositories, you might be surprised at what can be found using search.
To read the rest, go here.
Wednesday, May 18, 2011
Technical Tips: All Things Search
It is time for a few short tips on FAST Search Server 2010 for SharePoint and FAST Search Server 2010 for Internet Sites.
Tip One: Included with FAST Search Server 2010 for SharePoint is the Advanced Filter Pack. This Pack enables text and metadata extraction from hundreds of file formats, augmenting the document formats that are supported by Microsoft’s Filter Pack. This feature is not enabled by default during the installation of FAST Search for SharePoint. It can be enabled easily using Windows PowerShell, and the included script, i.e. “AdvancedFilterPack.ps1”
With the Advanced Filter Pack enabled, content and meta-data from the additional conversions are now available for mapping into your managed properties.
To read more about Filter Packs go to Microsoft Office 2010 Filter Packs download and overview. The Advanced Filter Packs are described here.
Tip Two: Do you really want to enable “Stopword Removal” on Queries?
Read the rest of the entry here
Friday, March 25, 2011
Enterprise Search Benefits
He goes on to articulate why this is the case. “What's getting in the way are internal politics, understaffing, and an unwillingness on IT's part to tackle the bigger requirements that could truly change how employees find information across a company. Too often, enterprise search technology ends up pigeonholed in a single department or used on a single data set--a big but underutilized investment.”
Considering that only about 10% of the companies have deployed what has been called full enterprise search, one can understand the lack of compelling business drivers. What constitutes a full enterprise search solution? That would be the indexing of all of the content inside a company’s intranet. Specifically;
- The unstructured data on file shares, SharePoint sites, websites and Exchange servers.
- Internal “runs the business” applications like CRM, ERP, etc.
- Content from external sources, probably acquired at query time via an Open Search interface.
- Cutting edge linguistic, and relevancy processing, as well as sophisticated presentation of the search results.
In deference to Andrew McAfee, who coined the term "Enterprise 2.0" a few years ago, the above search environment has been termed Search 2.0.
This virtual integration, which enables IT systems to work together through the search interface, should be reason enough to deploy Search 2.0. However, in the InformationWeek article, Mr. Healey, presented a survey of IT professional on the “Benefits of Enterprise Search”. The results are show below.
Read the rest of my article on BornToLearn
Wednesday, January 12, 2011
Is Linux dead on the desktop?
Having some time off during the holidays allows me catch up a bit on my reading. After reading Mr.Robert Strohmeyer, article on PCWorld titled “Desktop Linux: The Dream Is Dead” in which he states:
“Despite phenomenal security and stability–and amazing strides in usability, performance, and compatibility–Linux simply isn’t catching on with desktop users. And if there ever was a chance for desktop Linux to succeed, that ship has long since sunk”
Note that he is talking about desktop Linux not Linux in the server market where it continues to grow. Nor is he talking about Linux on mobile devices (like Google’s Android) or on embedded devices. He is looking at the market where Windows OS and Mac OS dominate, while Linux remains around 1%.
I have to say that even with the beautiful Ubuntu distribution, I have to agree, at least for the foreseeable future. At one time when the new category of netbooks first arrived, I thought this was the place that desktop Linux would finally show end users how far it had come. But then Microsoft dropped the price manufactures paid to license XP, and extended it’s support window, and suddenly, all the netbooks were running XP. Why did this transition take place? His reason is as straight forward as it is depressing true.
“Ultimately, Linux is doomed on the desktop because of a critical lack of content. And that lack of content owes its existence to two key factors: the fragmentation of the Linux platform, and the fierce ideology of the open-source community at large.”
At some point developers need to make some money off of their efforts. They don’t need to make a lot on each sell, i.e. reference the robust applications market (current at over 300,000 applications) on the iPhone that cost less than $10.00 apiece. But they do need some revenue to keep them interested in enhancing the software. As James Goshling noted in a recent blog posting:
“Developers follow the money. They aren’t evil, they just need to be fed and housed. Unless the Linux community gets over the whole “free” thing on the desktop, Strohmeyer’s pronouncement of death will hold.”
Again, sad but true.